Rayge

Members
  • Content Count

    2823
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by Rayge

  1. What possible reason would there be to include Chicago? Seriously, by reimagined I'm almost 100% sure they don't mean to add a large city on the east coast which could have it's own game.
  2. Rayge

    Tattoos

    I'm planning on getting a tattoo when I become an adult. Probably somewhere on my upper arm/ torso, so it's not seen when I'm going for a job interview. Maybe a wolf/tiger or a dragon, or some cool shit like that. Preferably something non-gang affiliated so I don't get killed.
  3. Probably some. But with 100% east asian parents, that then moved to San Francisco or another place in Calfornia, having kids there and not passing on the language.
  4. Definitely, I can't see how shooting down some planes is harder than flying across the city in a shitty, hard to control plane trying to take out vans... while on a fuel limit.
  5. Shot in the shoulder, collapse to the ground into a flexible mess, hovering around until you reach an area where you can stand up in, only to get shot by an automatic rifle again and again. Yup, sounds fantastic.
  6. I don't want the antagonist to be some down syndrome retard, that would suck. He should be intelligent and deceptive, and a real asshole like Tenpenny, as I said before. Someone that you just feel like slowly murdering for being such an asshole, even though they're just a fictional character in the game.
  7. What I meant was, I don't think it's possible to include 3 large scale cities, in full detail. And we're heading back to the state of San Andreas, not the game. It could just be a part of San Andreas, rather than the whole state. The map was also more realistic than any other GTA before, obviously because it was part of the next generation. I'm also not saying they will only include Los Santos, because that's pretty obvious. What I'm saying is that it's more likely to include a version of San Diego in a GTA version of Southern California rather than SF and LV.
  8. How the hell is it probable? Because you think so? Because from my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) San Francisco and Las Vegas aren't part of Southern California, or the surrounding areas of Los Angeles. How is it probable that they will return? There is no evidence or suggestion whatsoever indicating that they will, so please, enlighten me on why they will return. Well, it says reimagined southern california... Who says how far they can reimagine it. I dont know how you can go back to san andreas, without going back to san andreas. The liscense plates say san andreas.... Yeah, I guess it depends entirely on your own opinion on how far Rockstar will "re-imagine" Southern California. If GTA IV is any clue, they're heading for a somewhat realistic approach, further decreasing the chances of SF and LV. And even if they did, each city would have to be substantially smaller than if only LS and 1 more were included, or they would have to greatly cut back on a lot of detail.
  9. Of course graphics are important, but saying "X game is better than Y game because it has better graphics" deserves a punch in the face. I can still enjoy playing San Andreas' story now, even though the graphics are so bad. Same with World Of Warcraft, the graphics aren't good at all, but it's such a fun game so it doesn't really matter. What is needed is a balance between good graphics, and good gameplay. Personally would rather sacrifice graphics to hae better gameplay (AC III) than have phenomenal graphics but not having good game playe.
  10. Really doubt that will happen for the single player, GTA has always aimed to immerse you into someone elses story; making your own character wouldn't allow them to go into as much depth. Also, as mentioned above: protagonist = playable character antagonist = protagonist's main enemy
  11. Yeah that's what I've been trying to say. How the hell is it probable? Because you think so? Because from my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) San Francisco and Las Vegas aren't part of Southern California, or the surrounding areas of Los Angeles. How is it probable that they will return? There is no evidence or suggestion whatsoever indicating that they will, so please, enlighten me on why they will return.
  12. Parkour is actually overcoming obstacles using only your body. That's what it originated as, but since then it has evolved into doing fancy tricks to look cool. That would not be a good idea for GTA in my opinion, just the basics of fluid climbing and vaulting.
  13. Liam Neeson is indeed a badass, but personally I think someone of that age wouldn't fit very well into GTA, no matter how badass they are.
  14. Not wallspin backflip type parkour, but basic vaulting and climbing would be a good idea. In GTA IV it was so un-fluid when you paused to climb over something, or landed a jump. Horrible, I liked Sleeping Dogs element of parkour, not too over the top but not as bad as IV.
  15. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    No. Maybe to the untrained eye, but no. Just no.
  16. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    Want to be able to solo everything? Roll monk. Except for the fact like, 50% of WoW atm is monks. Even healer monks do dps at low level. Other good solo classes include paladins, priests and druids (from my experience, don't know about other classes). Mainly because they can self heal if necessary, allowing them to take on significantly harder mobs without as much trouble.
  17. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    Depends entirely on how you want to play. However the game is DEFINITELY a lot easier than it was a few years ago, probably to appeal to a larger group of people. But once you learn your class (type of character), you will start to become more effective at whatever role you choose. It doesn't take that long. When you start of at a low level, it's really simple. Then as you level, it gets more complicated but then you also gain more experience. Also: You can try the free trial. It allows you to create characters up to level 20, and let's you play forever. However it's really limited, and the real game is a lot better. If you ever start, roll hunter. They are the best.
  18. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    Yeah, it was pretty awesome. However you're only eligible if you have been inactive since before March 4, 2012. Can't think why they would have such a random date, it should be for being inactive for 1 year or something. I didn't have time to gear him, so he's practically a green/blue 85 druid. However I'm thinking of leveling him to 90 after my hunter, and before my DK.
  19. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    I haven't really played much at all since 2010... I played occasionally when they still gave out 7 days free, then I recently played (early this year) from the revamped (and totally awesome) scroll of resurrection, allowing me to get an instant 80 druid which I got to 85 in the majority of those 7 days. Now I'll probably be inactive until November/March, depending on how my math exam goes.
  20. Probably not, that idea has already been used up and would just make the story completely shit.
  21. Sorry, but that idea gave me cancer. The chances of all the GTA III era characters happily uniting in a wonderful tale of adventure in V are below... 0%.
  22. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    I love Nagrand, it's my favourite place in WoW. I never collected enough JP or HP to buy shitloads of heirlooms, and I only have about 10k g so I can't afford to buy loads of capes helmets and leggings from my guild.
  23. He's not trying to prove just that there is more than 1 city, he's trying to prove that San Fierro and Las Venturas will return - which they probably won't.
  24. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    105%? damn, that's a lot. That must significantly cut down your /played to get to 90, even though it's already been cut down a lot thanks to dungeon finder.