Rayge

Members
  • Content Count

    2823
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by Rayge

  1. Zombies are just the same generic, recycled shit that every game tries to incorporate because they know a buch of 13 year old zombie apocalypse survival proud american-nerds experts will buy it. In saying that, I must say some zombie games are decent, or even good (RDR), But now it's just such an unoriginal idea, and a lot of proud americans think they're the shit because they play zombie games and know the names of a few guns.
  2. Are you sure about that Massacre. I mean I know it looks good on PC but on my PS3 when you actually look at things upclose it's preetty average. I think you need to take Skyrim's landscape as a whole rather than inspecting it upclose. And Skyrim is by no means the best-looking open world game to date. Even though I was pretty awed when I started exploring the land for the first time, but after awhile and on closer inspection everything is pretty basic and bland ( and not very detailed with choppy textures ). This is almost definitely different for the PC because it has advanced graphics options and effects. Oh and even though Fallout 3 and New Vegas are great games. Both have very bland/ brown and generic environments that are very simply detailed aswell. I don't even know why I'm arguing about this bullshit, because I couldn't give a fuck about graphics. Gameplay is 10,000 times more important!!! How about you get perfect story with good graphics in V.... There's no doubt it will have "good" graphics. However, what he's saying is he doesn't want them to spend less time on the gameplay aspect just so the graphics look better than any game out there (which they won't, due to the limitations on consoles)
  3. Cars? Cadillac Coupe Deville Dodge Challenger Pontiac GP/GTO Chevrolet Impala Ford Mustang Chevrolet Camaro All these in 60's-70's models, of course. Some have pretty cool modern models as well (Challenger, Camaro, Mustang)
  4. I want to be able to knock people out and then put them in the trunk of a car. Then drive off to a secluded place and murder them, then dump their body in random places. That's Fucked Up. But Still Good Yeah, the internet has fucked me up from a normal person to a cynical and evil monster.
  5. Effect of getting shot in arm & torso is great, as you said but effect of getting shot in head would be more realistic than required . Because in most of missions you have would high no of chance to be dead in only one shot & i think it'll be annoying after some time later in game... You'd keep getting headshots causing instant death IMO. "These things should be rare though because in all honesty the only way getting shot in this game would work realistically is if most bullets just grazed you and caused your life gauge to decrease that way." Also, there were one shot deaths in RDR. Didn't annoy me. Agreed, shooting in RDR was good enough. Anything like that would be good enough for V, imo.
  6. I want to be able to knock people out and then put them in the trunk of a car. Then drive off to a secluded place and murder them, then dump their body in random places.
  7. It would be shit if they repeated a same character as the protagonist, from the GTA they released.
  8. Same here, that's why I play GTA - where murdering pedestrians, destroying vehicles and killing cops is acceptable and fun, so I don't have to do it in real life (because you know I would).
  9. Definitely, that's what happens when they allow so much hype to build while maintaining their ambiguous stance on releasing information.
  10. not if u kno how to use cover and run away from bullets Okay. I'll stand 20m away from you, and start shooting you with a full-auto rifle. Let me see you outrun the bullets
  11. I know - saw that picture while doing some work at school, thought it was pretty funny. My main post was underneath.
  12. Congratulations. Here, you deserve a prize. Good ol' Spidey. It is possible. However in my opinion, it's not going to happen. I guess I should say that instead, because other suggestions that they won't be are apparently not good enough to support my idea.
  13. I've been saying how they probably won't, trying to explain why. Not that they definitely won't, that they probablywont. Of course I might be wrong, but so might you, Kuz and Banana Pudding. Corrected myself afterwards. What was the second quote trying to prove?
  14. How the hell is it probable? Because you think so? I've been saying how they probably won't, trying to explain why. Not that they definitely won't, that they probablywont. Of course I might be wrong, but so might you, Kuz and Banana Pudding. And Banana Pudding hasn't been saying they might be in the game, he seems pretty sure they will be. "Grand Theft Auto V focuses on the pursuit of the almighty dollar in a re-imagined, present day Southern California." To me, this says the game is based in Southern California. Just because they say that doesn't mean the entire map is revealed, we know nothing of the map so far, just an idea of where the game is set - there's a difference. However, I understand what you're trying to say. The problem is that interpretation varies for everyone, so the only way we'll know for certain is when they physically release an image of the map. And I'm almost positive they're not passing up on creating a HD version of SF and LV, but I would rather they save them for their own games for later. Companies have a large selection of fantastic ideas and concepts, but they release them slowly, deliberately leaving out certain features that they can include in their next game/product, like the iPhone and many others. Imagine Rockstar made a GTA in a few years where you could go from LV to SF to LS to LC and loads of other cities by plane, in full HD with all the content imaginable. What then, once that game has had it's time?
  15. You just got yourself killed. You're right. I'm a moron. Now, explain to me what "so far means". You still haven't replied to my last post asking you what the reason is you feel so strongly that san fierro and las venturas will be in the game.
  16. The irony, it burns! Plus, I believe you can take a physics major or some shit like that in University to become an expert on the topic, highschool physics is nothing ( I think, I mean I'm at that stage)
  17. I've wondered that as well. I like history, and it's relatively easy to remember stuff. But learning from in depth games like AC is just so much better.
  18. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    They're both fantasy based MMOs, and they both have the minimap in the top right (without addons). Other than that, they're completely different. Controls and UI are way better in WoW than runescape, don't know how I ever managed to play Runescape with those controls. The UI has changed a lot (far smoother, but a recent update made it take more clicks to get to the quest list, my only gripe.). My only real issue is its fucking arrow keys instead of WASD, could be easily fixed if they made it click to the chat box to talk, but pressing any text key begins to type in the chatbox. They're both fantasy based MMOs, and they both have the minimap in the top right (without addons). Other than that, they're completely different. Controls and UI are way better in WoW than runescape, don't know how I ever managed to play Runescape with those controls. The UI has changed a lot (far smoother, but a recent update made it take more clicks to get to the quest list, my only gripe.). My only real issue is its fucking arrow keys instead of WASD, could be easily fixed if they made it click to the chat box to talk, but pressing any text key begins to type in the chatbox. Indeed, I used to occasionally log on sometimes, and I just ended up typing in wadsawdawasddaw all the time because I was so used to it for moving. However, arrow keys and wasd can't really be used if the game is going to run on the same engine, as it is still divided into... squares? That the players can/can't move onto.
  19. Don't forget that it's a game and enjoyment is more important than realism and logic. True, however it doesn't mean the game has to defy all logic. Some games, like Saint's Row are themed to be like that - just pure fun. Games like GTA (usually) try to evoke a connection with the character and atmosphere, and to some extent aim for semi-realism.
  20. Fuck that shit, I have to reply. Jesus fucking christ, let me make an announcement, people don't seem to understand what I'm saying. I believe there WILL be another city except Los Santos However, that doesn't necessarily mean it has to be SF or LV. It could be any other city. What I was saying is that San Diego is MORE LIKELY than SF or LV. Why you may ask? Because the game is loosely based on Southern California. Therefore it would make more sense. I know it's not impossible for SF and LV, but the chances are LOWER. It could still be the largest and most ambitious game, but that doesn't mean they have to include the same fucking cities from a previous game, just because they were there before. For all we know, "largest and most ambitious" could be entirely based on things to do in the game, mechanics and graphics. However it could also have something to do with the map, but who knows for certain.
  21. That reminds me of the days I used to play Zoo Tycoon, and I always placed random guests into the tank full of vicious man eating great white sharks.
  22. Possibly golden guns, I mean they were in Max Payne 3, and from the trailer it's evident gun attachments are available (supressor on the AK), so maybe golden guns will be too. Seems to be a popular thing to do, these days.
  23. Yeah it is true that San Diego is similar to Los Angeles. But it would be a lot more realistic and logical than any other city. To me, and I'm guessing most people, "reimagined" signifies different versions of various things associated with the area, or whatever it is that is reimagined. Not completely different cities that should be there just because.... They were in the last game. Anyway, I think I'll stop posting on this topic because both of you are positive that San Fierro and Las Venturas will be in the game, simply because they were in the last game set in the state of San Andreas. Good day, fine gentlemen.
  24. Rayge

    World Of Warcraft

    They're both fantasy based MMOs, and they both have the minimap in the top right (without addons). Other than that, they're completely different. Controls and UI are way better in WoW than runescape, don't know how I ever managed to play Runescape with those controls.