TreeFitty

Admin
  • Content Count

    5858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    158

Everything posted by TreeFitty

  1. The question he was answering was: They wanted to know anything about the game but obviously Rockstar wants to keep majority of it secret for now. Houser wasn't talking about only the map, but the map being big is all they have said so far.
  2. Probably because Rockstar's only statements on the game say: And: The window for the other cities is small. San Francisco is Northern California, and Vegas isn't even California. Rockstar has said it's Los Santos and the countryside. Neither of those cities are near Los Angeles and aren't countryside.
  3. Speaking of which, the party mode ended up being much more fun than the deathmatch. Plenty of time to gather weapons/ammo and devise a plan to get killed by me I mean kill the other players...
  4. It's possible, but remember that this isn't an exact replica of Los Angeles. Not everything is where it should be. I'll look into this some more later. Keep throwing evidence my way if you got it. edit: If you are correct, then the following is likely true: This would probably make the pointy building left of 100 Wilshire to be a take on 225 Santa Monica Blvd: (link) And if those are true, then there is more proof of the pier not being exactly where it is in real life when compared to the building locations. edit 2: I am starting to like your theory by the way. As for my map, that would bring the pier+area down a little more.
  5. I've looked at it, but not so sure they are the same. The one in the pier shot (1st pic) appears to have more flat angles where as the Century is rounded. Plus, you can see hills directly behind it and in the last shot (3rd) the hills are in front of it from the first pic's angle. I believe the first building is actually behind the hills on the right in the 3rd pic.
  6. Another publisher probably isn't going to push back their own game for someone else's. Just because Rockstar is awesome doesn't mean other companies bow down to them.
  7. Seeing as the other topic has a Survivor contest as well, locking this. Also because I have no votes in the other one.
  8. Back to E3 for a second: http://www.igrandthe...-about-gta-iii/
  9. I kind of disliked the skill level system because it forces experienced players to have crappy abilities near the begiining of the game. Although we all need to get used to a new game, it gets a little annoying later when you start a new game and cars/guns handle differently because you "have no skill". I don't care for RPG elements anyway.
  10. I think this is a little much for GTA.
  11. /moved and there's a topic about the next Xbox here.
  12. That was the Take-Two CEO talking in general about any of the games. They didn't point to any specific title and Zelnick would say the same thing about any console or device because they want to go where the money is. edit: Actually, the way the original article is written, Zelnick doesn't appear to be talking about only Rockstar either: This is how info gets misconstrued. It starts with a simple interview, another website posts some excerpts in a way that kind of changes the original meaning, and then n00bs pounce on it without looking at the source and mess it up further.
  13. Yes. Been bullshit for a while. There's another similar one with a van. They are both fake and I'm still pretty sure those videos have been around since before IV.
  14. What Massy said. It's my PS3 anyway I just used the TV screen in the bay.
  15. I want the ability to rappel down a building if you get stuck on a ledge with no other way down. Alternative to the parachute or something.
  16. I was so rusty since I'm used to RDR (IV feels so slow). Although there was one close confrontation with Vicey where I kept moving around because I was hitting the wrong buttons and ended up getting him.
  17. oh look at that. just had an error and needs to start all over again....
  18. Yes it's 7:02 right now. I'm actually on (shock) waiting for this update to go through...... slow.....