Qdeathstar

I agree with the last 5 comments, but im out of likes and have no other means of expressing myself. Brian thinks that seeing you esmoke will cause other people to want to esmoke.

Brian said he wasnt a fan of ecigs. Either that or he didnt read the topic.

Jea, dont get mad bro. Im set in my ways, set in my ways...

You started it. Your solution is the legislate the problem away. You wont even accept a perfectly acceptable alternative.

That's why I said to keep it in the privacy of their own homes, I feel the same with marijuana, legalize it for recreational use only in their own home. As you stated it smells like donkey shit, I don't wanna smell that walking down the street. E-Cigs may not smell like shit, but I don't enjoy inhaling that either. They're a better alternative for sure, but I still dislike it. Its steam? Actually dude, why dont you stay at home and act like a whiney ass bitch on twitter about how 2nd hand smoke killed your dog, grandma, and your sister...

Im trying to figure out what your saying?

Because dude, we arent a bunch of 4yo girls that arent able to determine right and wrong for ourselves. Im on the fence on banning public smoking, but this has no negative affects for anyone other than the person doing it. And its way better for you than actually smoking.

...

Watched zero dark thirty.. It was kinda long winded, but ultimately well produced. 6.5/10

Meant... Erm... Vast. O.O

Dr Drew says these things are a lot healthier than cigarettes, plus they dont smell like donkey shit.

I hear what your saying but I think that giving ulfric power would have the same general outcome as overthrowing the Sha of Iran did in the 1970s. I don't know all the details, but if a religion is enough to convince you to want to overthrow a government and install someone as morally weak as Ulfric, it's a pretty powerful religion. People talk about wanting religious freedom, but ultimately its only freedom to practice one religion, the worship of Talos. Its my opinion that if you get rid of the structured government of the empire its only a matter of time before religious freedom becomes religious fundamentalism. Also, although the empire has forbade worship of Talos, they seem to only enforce it when it serves their need to make some political point. There are plenty of people in Skyrim worshiping Talos. Then you have the dragons, bandits, and other factions within Skyrim to deal with. Ulfric might be dragonborn, but thats no reason to give him the riegns to the kingdom. The empire has an interest in protecting skyrim from these threats because Skyrim is a source of income in the form of taxes and raw materials for trade. I just dont see Ulfric acting in a simular or better manor. The empire is a continuing interest, which means that even when the current emporer dies, his son will take over. Because of this, the emporers want to ensure the strength of the empire over the long run. Ulfric, on the other hand is one man with a lust for power using religion as an excuse to topple a benign but unpopular government. He might care about protecting whiterun and solitude, but i highly doubt that places like winterhold will mater to a dictator like Ulfric. His game is to sqeeze the most out of the citizens now so he can enjoy the spoils of victory and after he dies, who cares what skyrim looks like. Ulfric might be ok if you live in the major trading cities in skyrim, because those will make him money. Outside of that, you beter start praying to talos.

I would go with the imperials, ulfric is a loose cannon after what he did in solitude...

Movie looks ... shitty. Whats the point in having robots if you still have to put humans in them? Also, gladOs is portal's thing.... Finally, the narrator is annoying. The guy also read a book I was trying to read on Audible called "The Grey" and i gave up on the audio part of the book because his voice was just tooo anoying. Meh.

Yes that's what I meant. Got the topics mixed up for a sec. It's ment primarily as bill board ad.. Then why reveal half of the boxart with it just to reveal the full boxart before it's even done? They could've just used 1 artwork or the GTA V logo as advertisement like they've been doing for a while now. I guess it's still possible that they'll reveal a video like they did for GTA IV. I think they probably just dont have their shit together... remember when the hurricane locally delayed the release of the trailer globally...

It's a hole in the ground.. Wouldn't get too excited about it IMO.

It's ment primarily as bill board ad..

Wall. Of. Text.

Re: realism and parachutes. "Players won't be able to fly their aeroplanes. There are no planes because it's just a city," says Houser, "apart from the fact that there's vehicles..wherever you are, it's still realistic." "Bellic is not going to be riding a Unicycle or Rollerblading around, we're giving a choice of variety that feels right for the character. We are not suddenly saying there will be no more motorbikes, were keeping all of that stuff, we are keeping the same range and diversity that we had it's just going to fit the character." - Sammy houser Says, stuffs realistic, flying planes is crazy talk. Not realistic in a one city world to have planes, ignoring the fact that a one city world is unrealistic. QD. Shocking with undeniable fact.

It sounds like Saints Row is a better game for you, if you're more about the crazy shit. GTA is a more realistic game, and thats what makes it so great. However the new direction Saints Row is starting to take is making it too over the top for me. I'm starting to see that peoples take on reality is very skewed by video games. Scary... Not being able to parachute out of planes in gta 4 because it would hurt the realistic aspect of the game is a lame excuse.

Sa story was honky to riches to honky got rich still gotta represent.

Hmm, i didnt watch sinister because it was made by the sconies that made paranormal activity.... Are you saying sinister was a good movie?

i ThInK tHaT BuYiNg CaRs ThAt BlOw Up WhEn YoU fLiP ThEm Is A bAd IDeA realism is a good thing if it's done right in certain aspects of the game, like i want realistic physics. and the way that cops try and kill you, but i don't wanna have cops be too realistic, like enforcing traffic laws and such. and i also wan't driving to feel realistic, but i don't want it too realistic to where we have to have gas and shit. you just need a good balance between realism and fun. because if you go too real the game will be dull and feel boring after a while, but if you make it too unrealistic you end up with saints row which fucking sucks(IMO). Realism isnt a key attraction though. Story and features are though.

No. Realism sucks. If I wanted to go on murderous rampage in Los Angelos, I'd do it. I'm more into jumping out if a plane aimed at downtown with a jetpack and a rocket launcher kind of guy... which is why I play gta.

"Meh"