iBeNiko

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    487

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by iBeNiko

  1. Posted · Report reply

    what would catch my atention is if you have a neighbor and the guy has a wife and kids and in the morning the kid goes to school and then you see the guy kiss/hug his wife and leave . then maybe say at nght you can see him drive up his drive way and head on home :D now that would catch my atention :)

    or you walk by a house and hear dogs barking or people argueing that would be nice

    I stopped at "kids" considering they don't have kids in GTA....

    i would welcome the addition though. but then you would have all of those parents who would say that it would it is a bad influence/murder simulator on their kids and would inspire more school shootings, even though the game would be rated M.

    • Like 1

  2. Posted · Report reply

    this isnt Call of Duty. Rock* isnt treyarch if they ever do a zombie mode for gta id never play it pointless ... sorry if i sound a bit harsh bro its just my opinion

    ^Captain obvious..... and since when is treyarch the staple for all zombie games? mater of fact. if R* did a zombies dlc in GTA 5 it would shit all over the entire cod zombies franchise.

  7. Posted · Report reply

    No. Realism sucks. If I wanted to go on murderous rampage in Los Angelos, I'd do it. I'm more into jumping out if a plane aimed at downtown with a jetpack and a rocket launcher kind of guy... which is why I play gta.

    realism is a good thing if it's done right in certain aspects of the game, like i want realistic physics. and the way that cops try and kill you, but i don't wanna have cops be too realistic, like enforcing traffic laws and such. and i also wan't driving to feel realistic, but i don't want it too realistic to where we have to have gas and shit.

    you just need a good balance between realism and fun. because if you go too real the game will be dull and feel boring after a while, but if you make it too unrealistic you end up with saints row which fucking sucks(IMO).

    • Like 1

  9. Posted · Report reply

    Micheals too old, Trevor's white trash, and Franklins on the verge of being obese (unless that's muscle).

    I doubt theres going to be any free running. It'll be smoother, but not parkour.

    that's basically what parkour is, free running without the tricks. like in gta 4 when running from the cops if you hopped a fence when running from the police and took advantage of all climbable objects that was basically parkour in the most basic form.

  15. Posted · Report reply

    or better yet the magnet chopper from San Andreas. it would add soo much fun, just flying around abducting random vehicles, and especially messing with people on multiplayer, just take their nice vehicle with them in it, and fly to the highest altitude and drop it.

    If the Skycrane returns as a pilotable aircraft, I intend to fly over a group of bling-toting honkys in South Central and pick them up by their gold chains, watches, and rings.

    Then, of course, proceed as you suggested.

    gold isn't magnetic though...

    and if anything you'll just take all their metal from them.

  16. Posted · Report reply

    I just watched the IGN analysis of the screens. This is the info they came up with:

    1. You cannot swim in GTA3, Vice City or San Andreas.

    2. You could not jump out of planes or helicopters without a parachute outside of missions in previous GTA's.

    3. You may get struck by lightning! (As if we haven't seen lightning in other Rockstar games before...)

    4. You might be able to walk around in the wilderness

    5. There will be more news at E3.

    Something I learnt is that IGN "journalists" don't really know anything about GTA... They'd rather make stupid movie jokes than analyse the screenshots.

    IGN is the biggest joke in all of gaming "journalism"